Archive

Author Archive

A Proposal To Green Creekside Park Tomorrow!

February 18, 2011 Leave a comment

North East False Creek Development Sites

Last night, the City of Vancouver held public hearings on a proposal by Concord Pacific to develop Lot 5B West (see map to left).

The False Creek Residents Association brought out three dozen speakers from every neighbourhood in False Creek to speak to the amenity package proposed for that development. There were so many speakers that Council had to extend the hearing until 11pm, but still had to refer more than eighteen speakers to Monday night.

It was the position of the FCRA to reject the amenity package proposed for the development outright in favor of an amendment we submitted last night (see Amendment 4.6 below.)

9.06 acre Creekside Park promised to Vancouver in 1990

The amendment calls for immediate transfer of Creekside Park’s future home on Lot 9 from Concord to the province for $1, as will have to happen eventually; immediate greening of that site with a foot of soil covered with lawn; and relocation of all of Concord’s commercial activities (such as Cirque du Soleil, etc.) to their own commercially zoned 6c South.

My remarks to council follow, as does our suggested amendment. Please click here to view video of the hearing – my brief remarks begin at 3:08, and then questions from councillors continue until 3:32 pm.

Read more…

Public Forum on Casino February 9 @ Chinese Cultural Centre

February 3, 2011 1 comment

Is this really Vancouver's future?

UPDATED 2/4:  Now featuring keynote addresses by  renowned Vancouver Architect Bing Thom & BIV’s Peter Ladner!

SAVE THE DATE! February 9, 7:00 pm at the Chinese Cultural Centre.

Are you concerned about building the largest gambling casino in Western Canada right here in downtown Vancouver, one of the most beautiful cities in the world?

Why are we tripling the size of the existing casino when gambling monies no longer support local community charities and  $400,000,000.00 has been paid by the government to private casino operators over the past ten years?

Many Vancouver residents are concerned the casino developer isn’t contributing anything to local community amenities.

In addition, the RCMP has warned about connections between casinos and organized crime, loan-sharking and money-laundering by criminal gangs.

Concerns have also been raised that this massive expansion of gambling next to Chinatown and the Downtown Eastside will create new social problems for those struggling with addictions.

Please join us to discuss your concerns on Wednesday, February 9 at the Chinese Cultural Centre at 50 E. Pender Street (two blocks W. of Main) in  Chinatown, just 2 blocks from the Stadium-Chinatown Skytrain Station.

The forum is being co-sponsored by the False Creek Residents Association, Strathcona Residents Association, Grandview Woodlands Area Residents, the BC Charitable Gaming Association, Alliance for the Arts of Vancouver and area churches.

Categories: Uncategorized

(UPDATED) Why I Support Councillor Woodsworth’s Motion B6

February 1, 2011 1 comment

Last night, February 1, Councillor Woodsworth’s motion passed with overwhelming support. There were a number of amendments and revisions and I’ll publish the final result as soon as it’s available.

But the result is unmistakable – a call for a review of gambling in the province and a refusal to rubber-stamp casino expansion until the contractual rights and interests of charities and non-profits to a share of gaming funds are protected.

When three of us first met last November to begin building opposition to this casino, we were told there was no point because the casino was a done deal, that whatever the Premier wanted, he got.

Last night, thanks to Councillor Woodsworth’s initiative, we played a small part in helping demonstrate Margaret Meade’s dictum in its purest form: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has.”

Read more…

Valentines Concert With Borealis String Quartet!

February 1, 2011 Leave a comment

Categories: Uncategorized

Vancouver Art Gallery @ Larwill Park?

February 1, 2011 11 comments

Vancouver City Council is considering a staff report today allowing the Vancouver Art Gallery to move to 2/3 of Larwill Park. This could be a wonderful development if they incorporate a concert hall on the other 1/3 of the land. As this has come up again, I’m reprising my original article about Larwill Park.

I’m also pleased to note that Michael Geller has recently come out in favour of my proposal to close Cambie Street between Dunsmuir and Georgia Streets, in order to provide restaurants and bars that can animate this area at night.

In its heyday, Larwill Park was a centre of life in the city, home to games of baseball, lacrosse, football and cricket; the site of political demonstrations, rallies, fairs and concerts; and a marshalling field and drill ground for troops. Parades, carnivals, Ferris wheels, sports and politics animated a site once dedicated to fun in a city not well known for it.

By contrast today it sits dark, covered in asphalt, used as a parking lot, and the blocks along Dunsmuir and Georgia Street east of Homer are dead at night, bereft of the street-level commercial activity that’s the life-blood of any urban setting.

Read more…

Correction To Article in BIV

January 31, 2011 Leave a comment

I have to make a correction to a comment that was misattributed to me in a recent article in Business In Vancouver, titled “Angry residents appeal Concord Pacific land assessment”

The article states:

Bickerton then alleged that the city didn’t appeal the assessment
because Concord Pacific has long been reported as a major donor to Mayor
Gregor Robertson’s Vision Vancouver party.

I did not allege or say that, and to the contrary, made a point of stating to every reporter I have spoken to about this story that we are in no way questioning anyone’s integrity. We are simply asking for equity and fairness.

My Letter Challenging Michael Harcourt et al To A Debate

January 22, 2011 1 comment

Following yesterday’s challenge, my letter to Michael Harcourt, the SFU Professors & Building Communities Society:

January 21, 2011

Dear Mr. Harcourt,

We first met at a debate you did in the Library 2 years ago. I was introduced to you as someone who ran unsuccessfully for council with the NPA. Your response was quite kind – don’t worry about that Sean, you said, that was an outgoing, rather than an incoming tide … “

It meant a lot to me at the time, and I was very impressed with your debate style.

Fast forward to today and we find ourselves on opposite sides of the HAHR report. Your organization and the SFU Profs have essentially stopped all forward motion out of a clear belief that what’s being proposed is wrong-headed.

I disagree with you, but I’m actually hoping you have an alternative to offer, so I’m challenging you, ABC and the SFU Profs to a public debate of these issues. You have all of the credentials and heavies on your side.

If you all truly have the courage of your convictions, and if it really matters so much, you will be willing to meet me in a public forum.

Who knows? We might even arrive at a solution.

Sincerely,
Sean Bickerton

My Friendly Challenge to SFU Professors, Michael Harcourt & BCS

January 21, 2011 3 comments

This week the professional staff of our City, the experts we’ve hired to advise us, produced a thorough, thought-through plan after three years of consultations and revisions under the rubric of Historic Area Height Review.

Nonetheless, some of our city’s most educated and influential citizens felt it necessary to oppose this plan for new housing in the DTES, successfully defeating any further consideration of this report’s recommendations for the DTES during the rest of this council’s term.

I strongly disagree with their position on a strict policy basis favoring something over nothing and want to know why they’ve intervened to shut down any progress in this way.

That is why I’ve publicly challenged Michael Harcourt, the SFU Professors, and the Building Communities Society to sponsor a public forum where we can debate these issues.

Mr. Harcourt, Professors of SFU, and the Building Communities Society – are you up for a fair debate? I am. Name the time and place.

Guns, Gangs And Steel II (an update)

January 16, 2011 2 comments

In December I wrote Guns, Gangs & Steel in response to the recent gangland-style shootout one block from our Mayor’s home. The purpose of that article was to draw attention to the danger of illegal weapons flooding into our province from unregulated American gun shows. Although all the facts relied on in that article were cross-linked to verifiable external sources, one commenter suggested I was wrong on the facts regarding American guns fueling violence in Mexico.

The U.S. government agreed with my assessment:

In December, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives announced it was seeking emergency authority to require 8,000 gun dealers near the border to report multiple purchases by any individual of high-firepower semiautomatic rifles that use a detachable magazine.

The death toll in Mexico’s drug wars is staggering — more than 30,000 people killed as of last year. The role of American-purchased guns in that carnage is also undeniable. In the past four years, more than 60,000 guns connected to crimes in Mexico have been tracked back to American gun dealers. About three-quarters of those weapons originated from gun shops in Texas, Arizona, New Mexico and California, the four states covered by the A.T.F. plan.

New York Times, January 16, 2011

The guns flooding into Canada across the northern border are no less dangerous. There was another shootout on our city streets this morning, in the parking lot of a 7/11 at Knight and 33rd.

Categories: Crime, News, Opinion, Vancouver

In Praise of Height And Density

January 12, 2011 9 comments

Sun Tower. Photo: Tom Hudock

Despite it’s sleepy reputation, Vancouver has always been a brash city of big dreams and rough ambition, a noisy, sprawling brat of a frontier town. It’s fitting we mark noon every day with the triumphal blast of a ship’s horn, and sound the “all’s well” at nine ‘o-clock with the blast of a colonial cannon.

In keeping with that rash optimism, some of the tallest buildings in the British Empire were built right here in Vancouver: The Sun Tower and Dominion Building at the beginning of the last century, and just fifty years ago the Electra building, from which that raucous noontime horn first sounded.

More recently, our pedestal-style towers have revolutionized urban design around the globe, garnering our city international awards and acclaim for our revitalized downtown core.

Despite worldwide acclaim, however, Vancouver’s penchant for going vertical has inspired local opprobrium, and a rash of ad-hoc, poorly-vetted spot rezonings – the Mayor’s ill-planned STIR initiative in particular – has undermined support for new towers right across the city.

I’ve lived in towers more than half of my life, ever since I first moved to the West End in the late 70s, and I’ve always enjoyed that more urban way of living.

More recently I spent twenty years in Manhattan. Living on that island, with all it implies can be daunting. But Sex and the City notwithstanding, true New Yorkers don’t really live in New York as much as they live in one of the dozens of smaller neighbourhoods that dot the city, each as different in their own way as the five boroughs surrounding the city.

View west from our NYC apartment. Photo: Tom Hudock

We were lucky enough to spend seventeen of those years in Yorkville, living at the Claridge House at 87th Street and 3rd Avenue. We used to call it suburban Manhattan, there were so many moms with double strollers on the sidewalks, and everything seemed so clean and tidy after some of the neighbourhoods we’d lived in.

Generally speaking, neighbours in east side buildings go to great lengths to ignore each other, a way of maintaining privacy in tight proximity. But community still existed inside the building with the staff, who became a kind of second family. On a recent visit back, four years after leaving, we stopped by to say hi and ended up sharing emotional hugs and tears, all of us surprised by the staying power and intensity of the connections we’d made.

Outside the building, within a four block radius, our sense of community was very strong. My dry-cleaner, Jean, knew my voice so well I never had to introduce myself on the phone. Our wine store – Mr. Wright’s – would deliver anything we needed on account, trusting us to stop and settle up the next time we walked by.

We had a tiny Italian deli 2 blocks up the street with as good a selection of olive oil as Whole Foods but at half the price. The local chinese – Chef Ho’s – knew us by name and all our favourites, as did any of a dozen other local merchants. Six of our closest friends lived within blocks of us. That strong sense of local community and having access to the best of the city so close at hand gave us the benefits of small-town living with all the convenience of a big city.

Paris Place in Tinseltown

The beauty of that tower lifestyle was that everything we needed was within four blocks of our home. As a result, we didn’t own a car and never needed one in more than two decades there.

Here in Vancouver, we live in Paris Place, the very first condo tower built in Tinseltown more than fifteen years ago. By contrast, Paris Place has a very strong sense of internal community. Neighbours know each other, help each other out, and come out for all of the events we put on.

Our Christmas party was remarkable this year, with a huge spread of food donated by local merchants – thanks T&T! It was packed with many different nationalities, languages, ages, religions and races all happily breaking bread together and toasting the New Year in a kind of multicultural melange representative of the very best this city can be.

Paris Place Christmas Party

Our residents love Paris Place.

And we’re thrilled that another tower, the Woodwards building, has helped bring our community alive, making it possible for area residents to attend major cultural events, go to university and take care of their banking locally for the very first time, all while providing homes for 250 people who used to live on the street.

The last tower to be completed in our neighbourhood has just gone up right next to Paris Place. It’s one of twelve new social housing developments made possible by Mayor Sam Sullivan’s innovative partnership with the Province, magically transforming what was once an open-air latrine and shooting gallery into a new residence for single mothers.

I will readily concede that towers are not appropriate everywhere. Parts of Burnaby stand mute witness to that tragic fact.

But married to our transit infrastructure and embedded where density already exists, towers provide homes for the homeless and affordable housing for families that can’t afford $1,000,000 lots. At the same time, towers bring services within walking distance and help build community where once only chaos thrived.

Sunset from Paris Place. Photo: Tom Hudock

Towers are an important part of urban vitality and help ensure sufficient population density so that schools don’t have to close, library hours don’t have to be curtailed and three-year-olds don’t have to pay user fees at the park. And condo towers help reduce local taxes by sharing costs with more residents per acre.

In fact, if we actually had enough towers in our city’s core we might even be able to afford a recital and concert hall downtown, just like every other city in North America half our size.

Perhaps most importantly, tower living creates the smallest ecological footprint per resident of any type of housing. For all of these reasons, towers have played an important role in Vancouver’s history and will continue to have a rightful place in our city’s future planning.

If those eager to preserve the character of existing neighborhoods, a concern I share, would consider transit-based density as an approach that would see future development aligned with our transit infrastructure  – on the borders of, rather than piecemeal dotted-throughout-and-destroying-the-character-of, existing neighborhoods – we could forge a new citywide plan for our 125th birthday this year that all could celebrate.

This approach would end the spot re-zonings that have raised so many hackles, while allowing well-planned development that is necessary to accommodate the thousands of new residents who continue to move to our spectacular city.

Vancouver has an extraordinary future as the western world’s gateway to the east. Our architecture and our dreams should reflect the audaciousness of that promise. Let that noonday horn roar and our downtown towers soar!

Woodwards Tower. Photo: Tom Hudock