Archive

Archive for the ‘Vancouver’ Category

Guns, Gangs And Steel II (an update)

January 16, 2011 2 comments

In December I wrote Guns, Gangs & Steel in response to the recent gangland-style shootout one block from our Mayor’s home. The purpose of that article was to draw attention to the danger of illegal weapons flooding into our province from unregulated American gun shows. Although all the facts relied on in that article were cross-linked to verifiable external sources, one commenter suggested I was wrong on the facts regarding American guns fueling violence in Mexico.

The U.S. government agreed with my assessment:

In December, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives announced it was seeking emergency authority to require 8,000 gun dealers near the border to report multiple purchases by any individual of high-firepower semiautomatic rifles that use a detachable magazine.

The death toll in Mexico’s drug wars is staggering — more than 30,000 people killed as of last year. The role of American-purchased guns in that carnage is also undeniable. In the past four years, more than 60,000 guns connected to crimes in Mexico have been tracked back to American gun dealers. About three-quarters of those weapons originated from gun shops in Texas, Arizona, New Mexico and California, the four states covered by the A.T.F. plan.

New York Times, January 16, 2011

The guns flooding into Canada across the northern border are no less dangerous. There was another shootout on our city streets this morning, in the parking lot of a 7/11 at Knight and 33rd.

Categories: Crime, News, Opinion, Vancouver

In Praise of Height And Density

January 12, 2011 9 comments

Sun Tower. Photo: Tom Hudock

Despite it’s sleepy reputation, Vancouver has always been a brash city of big dreams and rough ambition, a noisy, sprawling brat of a frontier town. It’s fitting we mark noon every day with the triumphal blast of a ship’s horn, and sound the “all’s well” at nine ‘o-clock with the blast of a colonial cannon.

In keeping with that rash optimism, some of the tallest buildings in the British Empire were built right here in Vancouver: The Sun Tower and Dominion Building at the beginning of the last century, and just fifty years ago the Electra building, from which that raucous noontime horn first sounded.

More recently, our pedestal-style towers have revolutionized urban design around the globe, garnering our city international awards and acclaim for our revitalized downtown core.

Despite worldwide acclaim, however, Vancouver’s penchant for going vertical has inspired local opprobrium, and a rash of ad-hoc, poorly-vetted spot rezonings – the Mayor’s ill-planned STIR initiative in particular – has undermined support for new towers right across the city.

I’ve lived in towers more than half of my life, ever since I first moved to the West End in the late 70s, and I’ve always enjoyed that more urban way of living.

More recently I spent twenty years in Manhattan. Living on that island, with all it implies can be daunting. But Sex and the City notwithstanding, true New Yorkers don’t really live in New York as much as they live in one of the dozens of smaller neighbourhoods that dot the city, each as different in their own way as the five boroughs surrounding the city.

View west from our NYC apartment. Photo: Tom Hudock

We were lucky enough to spend seventeen of those years in Yorkville, living at the Claridge House at 87th Street and 3rd Avenue. We used to call it suburban Manhattan, there were so many moms with double strollers on the sidewalks, and everything seemed so clean and tidy after some of the neighbourhoods we’d lived in.

Generally speaking, neighbours in east side buildings go to great lengths to ignore each other, a way of maintaining privacy in tight proximity. But community still existed inside the building with the staff, who became a kind of second family. On a recent visit back, four years after leaving, we stopped by to say hi and ended up sharing emotional hugs and tears, all of us surprised by the staying power and intensity of the connections we’d made.

Outside the building, within a four block radius, our sense of community was very strong. My dry-cleaner, Jean, knew my voice so well I never had to introduce myself on the phone. Our wine store – Mr. Wright’s – would deliver anything we needed on account, trusting us to stop and settle up the next time we walked by.

We had a tiny Italian deli 2 blocks up the street with as good a selection of olive oil as Whole Foods but at half the price. The local chinese – Chef Ho’s – knew us by name and all our favourites, as did any of a dozen other local merchants. Six of our closest friends lived within blocks of us. That strong sense of local community and having access to the best of the city so close at hand gave us the benefits of small-town living with all the convenience of a big city.

Paris Place in Tinseltown

The beauty of that tower lifestyle was that everything we needed was within four blocks of our home. As a result, we didn’t own a car and never needed one in more than two decades there.

Here in Vancouver, we live in Paris Place, the very first condo tower built in Tinseltown more than fifteen years ago. By contrast, Paris Place has a very strong sense of internal community. Neighbours know each other, help each other out, and come out for all of the events we put on.

Our Christmas party was remarkable this year, with a huge spread of food donated by local merchants – thanks T&T! It was packed with many different nationalities, languages, ages, religions and races all happily breaking bread together and toasting the New Year in a kind of multicultural melange representative of the very best this city can be.

Paris Place Christmas Party

Our residents love Paris Place.

And we’re thrilled that another tower, the Woodwards building, has helped bring our community alive, making it possible for area residents to attend major cultural events, go to university and take care of their banking locally for the very first time, all while providing homes for 250 people who used to live on the street.

The last tower to be completed in our neighbourhood has just gone up right next to Paris Place. It’s one of twelve new social housing developments made possible by Mayor Sam Sullivan’s innovative partnership with the Province, magically transforming what was once an open-air latrine and shooting gallery into a new residence for single mothers.

I will readily concede that towers are not appropriate everywhere. Parts of Burnaby stand mute witness to that tragic fact.

But married to our transit infrastructure and embedded where density already exists, towers provide homes for the homeless and affordable housing for families that can’t afford $1,000,000 lots. At the same time, towers bring services within walking distance and help build community where once only chaos thrived.

Sunset from Paris Place. Photo: Tom Hudock

Towers are an important part of urban vitality and help ensure sufficient population density so that schools don’t have to close, library hours don’t have to be curtailed and three-year-olds don’t have to pay user fees at the park. And condo towers help reduce local taxes by sharing costs with more residents per acre.

In fact, if we actually had enough towers in our city’s core we might even be able to afford a recital and concert hall downtown, just like every other city in North America half our size.

Perhaps most importantly, tower living creates the smallest ecological footprint per resident of any type of housing. For all of these reasons, towers have played an important role in Vancouver’s history and will continue to have a rightful place in our city’s future planning.

If those eager to preserve the character of existing neighborhoods, a concern I share, would consider transit-based density as an approach that would see future development aligned with our transit infrastructure  – on the borders of, rather than piecemeal dotted-throughout-and-destroying-the-character-of, existing neighborhoods – we could forge a new citywide plan for our 125th birthday this year that all could celebrate.

This approach would end the spot re-zonings that have raised so many hackles, while allowing well-planned development that is necessary to accommodate the thousands of new residents who continue to move to our spectacular city.

Vancouver has an extraordinary future as the western world’s gateway to the east. Our architecture and our dreams should reflect the audaciousness of that promise. Let that noonday horn roar and our downtown towers soar!

Woodwards Tower. Photo: Tom Hudock

Guns, Gangs And Steel

December 18, 2010 1 comment

Crime scene photograph by Pascal Marchand, Vancouver Sun

[First published in Vancouver Observer]

Last Saturday night, just two weeks before Christmas, ten young people were gunned down on the streets of Vancouver just one block from where our Mayor and his family slept. Eight of the victims remain hospitalized with two in critical condition.

While the retorts from the angry shots that rang out that cold, dark night have long since died away, aftershocks from that horrifying assault continue to reverberate throughout the city.

Several years ago, Jared Diamond published Guns, Germs, and Steel, a Pulitzer Prize-winning examination of the environmental advantages that allowed Eurasian civilizations to dominate, and in many cases decimate, other cultures across the globe. He attributed that dominance to three natural advantages he summed up as Guns, Germs and Steel.

I would argue that much the same kind of struggle is being played out on the streets of Vancouver today, but in this case the invaders are Gangs pouring over our southern border from the U.S.; their Guns — AK47s, machine guns and assault rifles — the weaponry of war; and the Germs they are spreading — violence and corruption — are infecting our youth and destroying the very fabric of the city we grew up in.

I am unable to recognize my own city when ten young people are gunned down on its streets.

I was born in Vancouver General Hospital in the 50s and grew up in rural south Surrey. Like most of our neighbours, we kept a .22 gauge rifle in the garage. Now, you can hunt small game with a .22, and I suppose you could wound someone, but a .22 would be littel use in a gun battle.

That’s why the illegal guns flooding into our peaceful province aren’t 22′s – they are illegal submachine guns, assault rifles and unlicensed handguns. And the gangs in Canada so eager to use them are aided and abetted by lax federal and state laws in the U.S. allowing anyone to walk into a gun show in Washington state (or any other state) and walk out loaded with assault weapons, machine guns and ammunition.

Representing 500 American cities, Mayors Against Illegal Guns found that states with the weakest gun laws are also the top suppliers of guns recovered in out-of-state crimes and the source of a greater proportion of trafficked weapons.

In cooperation with police departments across the country, the Mayors’ group identified ten laws proven effective in combating the scourge of illegal weapons. Washington state, our nearest neighbour, has only two of those laws enacted, Montana just one and Idaho none.

And sure enough, the states of Washington, Idaho and Montana, all of which share a common border with us, are net exporters of guns used in crimes, with an average 20% of the guns sold in those states used in crimes within two years of sale. Oregon, California and Nevada are even greater exporters of guns used in crimes.

Guess where the illegal AK47s sold at Idaho’s unregulated gun shows end up?

Mass arrest after gang shootout in Mexico

Canadians have watched in horror as one of our favourite holiday destinations, Mexico, has endured repeated paroxysms of gun violence. In a report released this past September, the Mayor’s group found that 75% of the weapons used in crimes in Mexico originated in four bordering American states. More concerning, the time lapsed between the original sale in the U.S. and the recovery of those guns at Mexican crime scenes is decreasing, a sign of ever-more sophisticated gun trafficking.

The same catastrophe is now playing out along our southern border, infecting Canadian cities with a growing plague of violence that is fast eroding our way of life.

I lived in the U.S. for twenty years, married an American, and have many relatives and close personal friends there. But it’s time that we face up to the ramifications of living next to the largest arms dealer in the world, a more violent country that tolerates the shooting deaths of 35,000 of its own citizens annually.

Unfortunately, Thomas Friedman’s flatter world may mean more markets for Canadian goods, but it also means Vancouver’s tony West Side has become a destination for Idaho’s unregulated sale of illegal assault weapons.

The simple truth is that American weapons are fuelling gun battles in Vancouver, leaving our streets less safe, families more fearful, communities more isolated and our entire city reeling in shock.

As I write these words, a Canadian citizen, Marc Emery, guilty of no crime in Canada, sits in an American penitentiary in Georgia because he so angered the U.S. with his sales of pot seeds that our federal government was willing to subvert the Canadian rule of law to extradite him to serve time for an American crime.

Now that this precedent of extra-territorial legality has been set, we should have the right to insist on reciprocity, demanding that the U.S. and neighbouring states extradite rogue gun merchants to serve time in Canadian jails for the far worse violence they are wreaking on our streets.

This overwhelming flood of Guns, Gangs and Steel across our southern border is a clear and present danger — not some imagined mullah in a faraway Afghanistan cave — but very real, domestic terrorists wielding assault weapons right here on our streets.

There should be no higher priority of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, the RCMP or the Vancouver Police Department than eliminating what must be recognized as an existential threat to the Canadian way of life.

If government is defined as the actor that enjoys a monopoly on the use of force within any jurisdiction, these gangs and their guns represent a direct threat not just to public safety but to Canadian sovereignty itself.

What Can Be Done?

Just one of many unregulated gun shows taking place across America

Authorities should focus first on eliminating illegal gun sales at source by targeting rogue American gun dealers through undercover stings, lawsuits and demanding better laws and enforcement from American states so quick to demand security concessions from us. Those found guilty of sending illegal weapons to criminal gangs in Canada should be extradited to serve time in maximum-security Canadian jails as the enemies of our peaceful nation that they are.

Second, the VPD and RCMP should start tracking data on every weapon used in the commission of a crime. If we know the manufacturer, seller and purchaser of every weapon used in a crime in our city, we can start interdicting those weapons in transit and at the border through intensified weapons inspection protocols, and tracking those that find their way into the arms of local criminals so they can be arrested on weapons charges the moment they take possession of illegal arms.

A smart prosecutor could easily use those weapons charges to mount an up-the-chain prosecution that would eventually bring down the kingpins behind this carnage on our streets.

Third, police in BC can now seize a citizen’s vehicle without charge or appeal for having one glass of wine too many. So why are we allowing known gangsters to live among us? Why can’t we enact laws that make commission of a crime using a weapon subject to much harsher penalties? And do the same for possession of any illegal weapon? One of the victims was charged with 27 firearm offenses just last month, yet was walking around free in our city.

In New York, Mayor Bloomberg has led the way in launching undercover stings and lawsuits against rogue gun dealers in Virginia funnelling illegal arms to gangs in NYC. And 500 Mayors in the U.S. have banded together to fight this illegal scourge.

In Vancouver, our Mayor was reduced to calling 911 in response to the automatic gunfire that broke out just one block from his home. If ever there was a more chilling metaphor for helplessness in the face of violent gangs, I cannot imagine it.

“There were no innocent people struck by bullets,” we’re told by police, as if a shootout on our public streets is no danger.

But with that logic we surrender our streets to gangs seeking to destroy our way of life. It is time to take our streets back and eliminate this flood of illegal weapons into our city.

Calling 911 is no longer enough.

Categories: News, Opinion, Vancouver Tags: , ,

We’re Number One!

October 24, 2010 1 comment

It’s official. We’re Number One! Vancouver is now the gay-bashing capital of Canada!

According to the Globe and Mail, Metro Vancouver police forces reported 34 hate-crime cases motivated by sexual orientation in 2008, the highest per-capita frequency of such attacks in the country.

There have been two gay-bashings within a block of my Tinseltown home in the past six months alone, one against two good friends on the front steps of their condo.

Here in Vancouver, sexually inadequate straight men are beating gay men on the steps of their homes while their younger counterparts are using bullying and taunts to drive their gay peers to suicide on schoolyards across North America. Even the Georgia Straight of all papers has joined in the sport, taunting a male teenager in bold-faced headlines using those exact same epithets. (The Straight later deleted the word “dick” from the headline but has yet to issue a correction or apology.)

2008 Press Conference on Gay-Bashing in front of Shoppers Drug Mart on Davie

So it is that I find myself in my fifties attending vigils against hate and talking to editors and organizing press conferences and community meetings with the Police Chief in response to the bashing of close friends.

Twenty-seven years ago I was walking home late at night from Vancouver’s first gay disco, the Gandydancer, when I was attacked by two off-duty bouncers in front of the Shoppers Drug Mart on Davie.

By the time a good Samaritan intervened, driving his van right up onto the sidewalk to scare them off, I was lying unconscious on the sidewalk and they were putting the boots to my head. The police told me that man’s intervention saved my life. I regained consciousness on the operating table as the doctor was stitching me up.

My mom and sister picked me up from emergency and took me up to the lake, where I retreated to lick my wounds and recover my strength. My head was the size of a basketball and face bruised beyond recognition. Though long faded, I still have the scars.

Typical of victims, I blamed myself. I was ashamed by what I had let happen to me, and that my family had to see. It confirmed their worst fears of what being gay had in store for me, and it took a while for me to face my friends again.

The police felt I should consider myself lucky and actively discouraged me from pressing charges, a common attitude at the time. The witness had returned to Alberta, the two bouncers were saying I’d attacked them, and because I’d been kicked unconscious I was unable to identify the attackers.

So I decided to take that beating as a kind of cosmic wake-up call. I stopped smoking, quite partying so hard, started running again and working out and took charge of my life. I was twenty-seven and my vow was to make sure I never put myself in such a vulnerable situation again.

Our wedding in Lions Bay

Which is why it seemed so improbably and wonderfully poetic to return to my hometown, scene of that long-ago bashing, and marry the man I love, surrounded by friends and family who had traveled from Europe and all over North America to witness the historic occasion of our Big Gay Wedding.

I thought in many ways that that marriage represented a chapter closed, a neat ending to a period of gay activism that began when I came out back in the seventies and continued as I spent the rest of my life pushing back boundaries and trying to open doors.

I never expected that process to be easy, but I embraced it because in so doing, I embraced myself, the core of who I am, my own strength. Coming out publicly and pushing back against the status quo was a liberating rebuttal to the fear and bullying I’d endured back in grade school and the early days of junior high, back before I’d learned how to fight back. It was the early source of my activism.

In marrying my husband as an adult male, I thought that final social barrier of acceptance and equality had been crossed and I could relax. Yet here we are in the 21st Century, more than three decades since I first came out, and my vow never to let myself be that vulnerable again is risible in light of an epidemic of gay-bashings in this city, especially the two right next door.

Despite these setbacks, however, there is hope.

Gay men and women are able to marry here, something prohibited by repressive governments all over the world. Gay men and women serve proudly and openly and with distinction on the front lines in our military and police force.

Vancouver Pride Parade

The Pride Parade in Vancouver is not only the most popular parade in our city, it’s one of the largest in North America.

For those of us who marched back in the parade’s early years it’s a bit hard to believe. My closeted friends back then kept urging us to look less grim and smile more, while we worried about someone lobbing beer bottles (or worse). Yet look at the cheering families lining the route today!

I remember the days when gay men had to meet in unlicensed speakeasies and were subject to mass arrest just for congregating. The relationship with the VPD was toxic at best. Today Police Chief Jim Chu and his men are cheered as star participants in the parade, a remarkable development given the history.

We have elected politicians that speak up for our rights – the NDPs Svend Robinson, the first gay man elected to the Canadian parliament, the NPA’s Alan Herbert – the first openly gay councillor elected to Vancouver City Council – and others that have followed in their courageous footsteps.

Thanks to their efforts, and the efforts of the man many of us claim as the first gay Prime Minister, we also have Canada’s landmark Charter of Rights and Freedoms to protect us. Gay characters are ubiquitous in books, on TV and in film, no longer playing just the despised, marginal and suicidal, typical of earlier decades when I was young.

City Councillor Ellen Woodsworth

And we have courageous young student leaders, like Taylor Basso, who spoke so eloquently at the Vigil Against Hate at City Hall last night. He said its not enough just to mindlessly state that things are getting better when they aren’t, and he’s right. Clearly the battles many of us fought and thought we’d won decades ago are still being fought today anew by this next generation.

So there is work to do. But compared with just a few decades ago, when gays lived in closeted shame subject to blackmail and arrest, we’ve made great strides. Speaking at the same vigil, David Holtzman brilliantly reminded us of the things we love in this country, love being the perfect antidote to the hatred we’re responding to.

My hope is that this next generation can build on the work already done and stand on the shoulders of those like Jim Deva who have manned the barricades of the past so that one day, children in Vancouver will not grow up in the gay-bashing capital of our nation, but the gay marriage capital of the world!

Categories: LGBT, News, Opinion, Vancouver

College of Family Physicians Recognizes Sam Sullivan’s Work on Addiction & Homelessness

October 15, 2010 Leave a comment

The College of Family Physicians of Canada is awarding former Vancouver Mayor Sam Sullivan an Honourary Membership, citing his work on behalf of “… the needs of the homeless and inner-city populations and programs for those battling drug and substance abuse”. The College states that “Mr. Sullivan has demonstrated courageous leadership in introducing and supporting programs for inner-city populations in need”.

This recognition marks the first time a former Mayor receives this award and he is one of only three “outstanding Canadians” being recognized in 2010.

As Vancouver City Councillor he was a supporter of the establishment of North America’s only supervised injection site for people with drug addictions. As Mayor he raised the $175,000 required to develop the SALOME project proposal which has now received several million dollars of government and private funding commitments. The project will see hundreds of people with drug addictions in Vancouver transitioned from illegal street drugs to legal medications as a way of reducing crime, medical and other societal costs and improving health.

Mayor Sam Sullivan oversaw the largest commitment to social and supportive housing in the City of Vancouver in over 30 years. He received provincial support for 12 new supportive housing projects on city-owned land for more than 1000 hard to house people. He also supported the provincial government purchase of 18 low-income hotels with a $5 million contribution. He lent his personal support to the establishment of the Street to Home Foundation and worked with the federal government and Senator Michael Kirby on getting $20 million to support those with mental illnesses in Vancouver.

Sam Sullivan advocates for those with mental illness and drug addiction through his Global Civic Policy Society. In 2009 he hosted a forum on these issues attended by 250 people. On November 3 at the Vancouver Playhouse Theatre he will host a Public Salon featuring former City Drug Policy Coordinator Donald MacPherson among others. As Mayor, Sullivan was heavily criticized for his position on drug addiction, mental illness and homelessness and narrowly lost the opportunity to run for Mayor in the 2008 election.

Sam Sullivan said, “I am very honoured that the professionals who are most knowledgeable about the needs of our most vulnerable have chosen to recognize my efforts. I hope this will remind people that these issues require our continued support”.

Sam Sullivan has received the Order of Canada, Christopher Reeves Award and Terry Fox Award for supporting Canadians with disabilities. He has received the Peter F Drucker Award for non-profit innovation. His EcoDensity Initiative won the 2009 Canadian Planners Institute highest award for City Planning. This latest award marks the first time a prestigious national body has recognized his work on addiction, mental illness and homelessness issues.

The Mayor Has Caused Quite A STIR!

September 7, 2010 3 comments

Even in the dog days of summer, when most Vancouverites are happily tuned out to politics and tuned into the beach, baseball and backyard BBQs, Mayor Robertson’s program to increase rental housing in the city has created such a stir he’s been forced to call a halt to the signature project of his STIR initiative – a new 22-story tower proposed for 1401 Comox in the West End.

Incredibly, what began with the Mayor’s unguarded, expletive-laced tirade against the city’s Non-Partisan Association has metastasized into a crisis of confidence in the legitimacy of the city’s planning and consultation processes.

In a recent interview with the Vancouver Sun, Mayor Robertson himself admitted “the city doesn’t have strong relations any more with many community groups” and that “many neighbourhoods are actually wary and distrustful of city hall.”

Even Vision’s communications guru, Marcella Munro, agreed last week during our discussion on CBC Radio that “the city’s public consultation process is flawed, is broken.” Our debate of the Mayor’s ill-fated STIR program was featured on the CBC’s Early Edition program on Wednesday, September 1, hosted by Gregor Craigie. To hear it in full, click on the play button below:


It didn’t have to turn out this way. During the election, the Mayor promised more transparency of decision-making, more consultation and more sensitivity to neighbourhood concerns.

What happened?

To put it succinctly, Mayor Robertson’s STIR program was misguided from the start, seeking to address a problem that didn’t exist with a solution that doesn’t help.

In response to cries for help from West End Seniors and low-income renters wishing to stay in place but facing large rent hikes, the Mayor, instead of addressing their very real and specific problem, adopted the simplistic bromide that we need more rental housing in Vancouver. This despite the fact that more than 900 apartments were listed for rent on Craiglist in just one day last month, while a recent CMHC report showed Vancouver’s vacancy rate has doubled to 2% in recent years.

Having misdiagnosed the problem, Robertson compounded his mistake by proposing a solution not designed to reduce rents or create affordable housing, but instead designed to create more expensive market-rental housing. A recent analysis of the developer’s pro-forma reveals the projected suites will rent for approximately $2.70 per square foot, nearly double the city’s current average rental rate of $1.50 – $2 per square foot.

Even if you accept the Mayor’s program as a worthy initiative in and of itself – “this city needs more rental housing” – the question has to be asked: “What is the benefit, and at what cost?” Each STIR project will cost the city millions of dollars in foregone tax revenues and amenities, yet the result is market-rental housing. What business is it of government to produce market-rate anything?

Presumably, the Mayor’s trickle-down housing project would also eventually provide relief to the by-now-evicted seniors the program was supposedly created to help, but it’s unclear exactly how that would happen.

Lastly, for decades, Vancouver has adhered to a strict formula for assessing the community amenities each developer is required to contribute in order to compensate the local community for increased density. This formula is 2.75 acres of park for each 1000 residents in every new development. When sufficient parkland wasn’t available, the difference was made up by a comparable contribution towards needed city amenities.

One of the first things this Mayor did was throw that time-tested standard out the window, replacing the level-playing field it provided with STIR’s ad-hoc, spot-rezoning approach that requires a separate, back-room negotiation for every project. Instead of a steady, predictable regulatory environment, developers now face an uncertain environment, eroding business confidence and the underlying pinnings of this city’s economy.

Given a policy so full of holes and internal contradictions, yet so costly to taxpayers, it was inevitable that questions and eventually objections would arise. But listening hasn’t proven to be one of Mr. Robertson’s strong suits.

Determined to be the first Mayor to deliver new West End rental housing in more than thirty years, Robertson brushed off all objections as political obstructionism and, incredibly, conflating his own supporters in the West End Neighbours Association with his nemesis, the NPA.

Having negated all outside voices, the echo room in the lock-step, me-too Vision caucus ensured that no one bothered to ask any of the tough questions that could have helped this neophyte mayor avoid being hoisted on the petard of his very own pet program.

The regrettable result is that the Mayor has been forced to call a halt to a year-long development process he initiated, leaving the developers and Qmunity to dangle in the breeze along with those seniors he forgot about as soon as he came up with the acronym.

If that were all, it would be bad enough. But this half-baked, ad-hoc policy has left the city’s planning process a shambles, faith in public consultation broken, the city’s management team demoralized, developers unable to create new housing, Qmunity without a home and renters no better off than they were before the Mayor decided to create this unnecessary STIR in the first place.

Is Vancouver Being Taken For A Ride by Critical Mass?

August 14, 2010 1 comment

The Georgia Straight published the following article by Matthew Burrows on Thursday, August 12, 2001:

Former NPA candidate Sean Bickerton slams Critical Mass

A former Non-Partisan Association city council candidate is calling on Critical Mass riders to “declare victory” and reform the controversial month-end bicycle ride in light of recent gains.

“I saw the point of it when there wasn’t any dedicated bike infrastructure, when there were no protected or separated paths,” Sean Bickerton, an occasional cyclist, told the Straight by phone.

“But when we’ve got an integrated network of safe bike paths that are separated, I don’t understand how they can simultaneously insist on the right to take over the entire road infrastructure, tie up the traffic for an hour, endanger emergency vehicles, tie up needed police resources that are scarce, without any coordination, without a permit, without paying any of the policing costs that go with it.”

For these reasons, Bickerton feels, cyclists should “comply with city regulations and laws like everybody else using the roads has to do”.

Critical Mass sets off from the Vancouver Art Gallery at 6 p.m. on the last Friday of every month, with the number of participants varying according to the weather and time of year. The ride is often criticized because the route isn’t announced ahead of time, which would help motorists to avoid it, but is arrived at by consensus during the ride.

Brent Granby, president of the West End Residents Association and an avid cyclist, told the Straight, “A city is never just about the efficient transportation of goods and services; it’s also about celebrating the city itself and the values that we have.”

Granby, a regular at Critical Mass, disagrees with Bickerton.

“Fundamentally, I think he just misunderstands what Critical Mass is about,” Granby said. “Like in medieval cities, they would open up the town square and they would have celebrations, and they celebrate being together and they celebrate their values as a society, and that’s what Critical Mass is about as well.”

He added, “I don’t think it’s too much to ask on the last Friday of the month, and usually we’re only talking about four months in the summertime. It’s a great thing for the city. It’s tourism. It’s like the running of the bulls.”

Last year, Vancouver mayor Gregor Robertson and police chief Jim Chu called for a predetermined route for the ride in a joint news release ahead of the July 31 event, but the idea was not implemented.

Can You Hear Me Now?

July 25, 2010 2 comments

The sad truth is that our public consultation process appears to be broken, leaving little trust on any side of the equation:

  • Residents that dare express an opinion on new development in their neighbourhoods are regularly derided as NIMBY no-nothings …
  • The developers that built the extraordinary city we see around us and provide the daycares, rec centres and libraries we need are regularly decried as barbarians intent on destroying every last vestige of everything held sacred …
  • City planners are unfairly defamed as incompetent, uncaring or corrupt. and often in the breath …
  • And the public’s overall opinion of politicians is unprintable …

We’re told the overarching concept for our city’s future is ‘Green Capital,’ yet eco-density has become so loaded with partisan invective it has become a stand-in for “I want to destroy your neighbourhood” on the one side and “I would rather die than see one new building in my community” on the other.

Unfortunately, the very solutions that might help – neighbourhood plans or visioning exercises – are reputed to be too expensive, time-consuming, complicated or beyond the city’s resources.

What to do?

I have a suggestion.

2011 is the 125th Birthday of the City of Vancouver. A much-belated and reluctant effort by the city to embrace a year-long celebration envisaged by the previous council has led to a tepid, half-hearted effort, and the community and arts groups charged with staging the celebration are left uncertain of funding.

Perhaps we should take advantage of the oversight to propose an entirely different kind of birthday present for our city. What if we celebrated this anniversary by engaging in a four-year planning process to lay out a broad neighbourhood-by-neighbourhood City Plan for the next 125?

In that four year period – the life of the next council – we could take the time to do the following:

1) Reinvent and reinvigorate the planning and consultation processes.
2) Prepare a thorough analysis of what assets each neighbourhood has, those it lacks and a vision or plan emphasizing its unique character.
3) From the neighbourhood study, prepare a comprehensive list of assets the city needs.
4) Develop a new CityPlan taking into account the individual plans and needs of each neighbourhood along with the needs and future growth of the entire City.
5) Implement broad-based zoning based on that plan.

I realize the best-laid plans can easily end in quagmire, but if we actively involved city planners, area residents, businesses, schools, social profit organizations and the developers in creating a meaningful consultation process, and if we allowed each community to participate in the horse-trading surrounding density and needed amenities in their community, we might find more commonality than is thought now to exist. False Creek North is a classic example I’ll write more babout later.

One final thought. I think transit-based density is the key. If we focus density where it already exists and along major transit arterials, and if our plans provide enough street-level commercial to animate streets and provide needed local services within walking distance of each community, we could manage the change coming to our city as we continue to add residents in the most environmentally responsible way possible.

One thing is certain. If we don’t take this opportunity to plan the future of our city for the next 125 years, that spot-rezoned future will plan itself.

But it won’t be pretty.

“Who Are These Hacks?”

Who indeed, Mr. Mayor?

Sadly, the Mayor’s profanity-laced diatribe deriding petitioners before his government is not an isolated incident.

His comments are instead reminiscent of comments made by the Mayor and Councillor Jang about residents of False Creek North when they dared complain about the mayhem caused by No-Rules Shelters forced on that neighbourhood.

As Michael Smyth wrote in the Province at the time after reporting on the legitimate concerns expressed by those residents at a public meeting: “Even then, some of Robertson’s Vision Vancouver councillors opted to lecture and harangue residents rather than respond to their concerns. Instead, Jang suggested the residents simply don’t care about poor people.” At least that’s what they said in public …

The Mayor’s use of profanity isn’t as bothersome as the disdain for dissenters expressed in its usage.” Gary Mason, Globe & Mail

[Youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IDcmUQa0WM]

The most recent intemperate remarks by the Mayor are concerning not because they’re unusual or profane, but because they are part of a larger pattern of contempt for the citizens of the city he runs:

Robertson reveals himself as ignorant, arrogant.” Michael Smyth, The Province

That same arrogance and contempt for public process is often on open display in council chambers. Attend any council meeting and it’s possible to observe first-hand the lack of respect accorded to anyone not wearing Vision’s bright green colours.  Andrea Reimer wielding the gavel in the Speaker’s chair is singularly dismissive and sarcastic to Councillor Woodworth and Councillor Anton to the point of derision. She forgets that while they aren’t important in and of themselves, they represent voters and points of view that the electorate wants heard.

Vision is like a bully misbehaving.”  Dharm Makwana, 24 Hours

In short, the contempt exhibited by this administration for voters and long-established democratic processes has been apparent for all to see for some time.

His stay in the Provincial Parliament was relatively brief, but perhaps the Mayor and his crew spent a little too much time in Victoria even so, infected as they now appear to be with the same contempt exhibited towards the taxpayers of Vancouver by the bureaucrats and politicians in Victoria.

Do what you’re told and say what we tell you to say seems to have replaced professionalism at city hall.” Gordon Clark, The Province

The people who appeared before the Mayor deserve his full respect, that of his Council and the entire government of The City of Vancouver. And contrary to the Mayor’s remarks, we know who they are. They are the people who make the city work, the volunteers who dedicate thousands of hours of their own time every week across the width and breadth of our city for no reward.

They are the people who apparently care more about our city, Mr. Mayor, than you do.

My Remarks To Mayor & Council On Viaduct Study

June 26, 2010 2 comments

Madam Chair, Mr. Mayor, Councillors, Staff and Guests:

I speak to you today as the President of the Paris Place Strata Council and as a resident of the International Village on the proposed study to examine bringing down the Georgia Street and Dunsmuir Viaducts.

Forty years ago, a misguided government of the day built those viaducts in an attempt to remake Vancouver into Los Angeles, destroying Hogan’s Alley - Vancouver’s historic black community – in the process and walling off Chinatown from growth and from the rest of the city.

Today we’re finally contemplating the correction of that ancient mistake and in so doing see the possibility of re-integrating a long-neglected neighbourhood into the traffic grid and the downtown core of the city.

Photo: Tom Hudock

I pass under those viaducts almost every day on my way to walk on the seawall. The space underneath is dead, littered with needles and the broken glass of too many car break-ins to count. The vacant lots beneath the viaducts sit empty most of the time, used sporadically for temporary parking, junk storage, as public latrines and far worse.

Put very simply, dead streets are not safe streets.

Seattle’s tearing down their viaducts, as are cities across North America including Toronto, Montreal, Boston and San Francisco among others. And during the Olympics, we learned we could live without them too.

For all these reasons and more, back in January, I issued a New Year’s greeting to friends and supporters calling for the viaducts to come down and a 1000 parks to bloom in their place.

I received a number of unhappy calls as a result …

Hogan's Alley, Vancouver's historic Black village

But I’m here today to support this study as a resident of the area and on behalf of my strata because I believe it’s the right thing to do for my neighbourhood and our city.

To ensure that this works for everyone, though, care must be taken to ensure that Strathcona and the neighbourhoods along Pacific are not inundated with diverted traffic while Georgia Street traffic flows are accommodated. This study is crucial therefore to be sure this step can improve the quality of life for everyone in the areas affected.

But more than just a study of the viaducts in isolation, we need a comphrehensive, integrated plan that encompasses all of the changes and needs currently facing this dynamic area of the city.

First, this study should address solutions to deliver Creekside Park in the context of all the new development in Northeast False Creek. I find it greatly encouraging that the planned study will examine new technologies and scientific research on remediation, which may well solve the current impasse on remediating soils on Lot 6c – the challenge holding up delivery of Creekside Park on Lot 9.

Photo: Tom Hudock

We are facing an estimated increase in population around False Creek of nearly 25,000 new residents and need park space and recreational and cultural amenities commensurate with that increase.

Tom and I lived in Manhattan for twenty years and loved that dense, vibrant environment. One of the things that makes it possible to live there is the huge park easily accessible in the centre of the city – Central Park – and all of the large neighbourhood parks and pocket parks scattered across the city. As we grow, we will need the same.

Other issues need to be addressed.

The Dragonboat Festival needs a new home. The Sun Yat-Sen garden celebrates their 25th anniversary next year, yet they lost a crucial tour bus stop in the construction of the Carrall Street Greenway, and want to open the garden to the south. A massive and ugly casino is proposed that offers no amenities to the community and no funding to the arts. Why should anyone support that zoning change?

And many are concerned that the Great Wall of viaducts currently isolating Chinatown is not simply replaced with a Great Wall of towers that do the same thing. Development in proportion to new park and recreational opportunities is called for.

We have an opportunity to plan an entire community and I hope this viaduct study will lead to that more comprehensive neighbourhood plan with full public input and participation.

Thank you.